By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:
DonFerrari said:

Errrrr I guess you were talking that Zelda would look much worse on PS3, not that UC4 would look much worse on PS3 (in this case yes we could agree, altough seeing what they accomplished in UC2 and 3 I wouldn't worry too much). So you think WiiU is so much better than PS3 that they would need to downgrade everything in half? Ok keep gaming on the power hog you have there.

Eh... no, those are only your words

I have never considered my WiiU a specially powerful console, specially since my PC must be like 5 times more powerful, but I can see when a game is pushing the console beyond any other game on the system, and that's why I'm impressed, this is using some modern techniques that I see on some of my PC games but I would not expect to see them on a hardware like that in the way Zelda is doing it.

You are claiming Zelda would have to be 480p to run on PS3.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."