Miyamotoo said:
hadoram said:
Sure, but the wii u is stronger then the ps3/xbox 360 and games like the last of us are technically still way advanced. Nintendo just isnt into this expensive AAA technical impressive graphics buisness. They choose the cheaper road ( artstyle, no voice acting, no motion capturing etc.), similar to what indies are often doing (because they dont have big budgets).
Im sure a game like Mario Kart Wii or even Mario Kart 8 really werent expensive to make, not needed big teams to develop. Games like Driveclub or Forza are probl way harder to make. Nonthekess nintendo manages to sell alot more copies of their games even with less money/work put into them (in comparison to the competition).
Thats maybe also one reason why nintendo isnt developing alot realistic looking games anymore, If they want them to look as good as the competition (even as good as the competition on ps3/x360) thats damn expensive. With cartoony graphics they cann still make games looking really beaitufll but saving tons of money, and thas anyway what their fanbase wanted.
|
Mostly, but for instance Xenoblade X is technically very impressive game for Wii U hardware.
Defintaly not expansive compared to AAA titles from other devolpers.
One of reasons is why is Nintendo not going with realistic graphics is that today almost every AAA game realistic graphic, also they prove you don't need realistic or technical graphic to have beautiful, great game that will have good sales.
|
That and stylized graphics tend to age better. I mean, it's rediculous how a lot of us thought the graphics back in the 6th gen that focused on realism were awesome back in the day. Now they look like wet garbage while something like Windwaker still looks great.
