Nem said:
If you are getting for the games, fair enough. Not that they don't have great sales anyways, so even if you didn't sub you would be able to get them by as cheap or cheaper. But that in no way justifies hiding the acess to online gaming to dupe people into paying for something they hardly use under the guise that you "might" get some good free games. PS4 has shown you mostly indie games. And no i would not. And i find it sad that you are trying to right me off as a Nintendo fan. I have more Sony systems than Nintendo and microsoft system you know? Doesn't make me a Sony fan either. I will point out the smelly stuff anywhere i see it. |
Nobody is being duped. And he didn't "right you off" because you are a Nintendo fan, he simply posed you a question and you're being very defensive about it.
It's quite simply, Nintendos network is a long way behind PS and Xbox. It will always be way way behind unless it becomes a paid for service. I'm happy to pay £4 a month for a good network, discounts, free games for my PS4/PS3 and Vita. If you think the games haven't been up to par, I can agree with you on some level on the PS4(it's very subjective though and every body will either find more or less value than me). Even not being up to standard of the PS3 days I still get more than my moneys worth in games that I do like.
Even so, nobody is being duped, you can see what games were given away for free in past month and Sony release a list of free games prior to a new month of PS+. It's not like you pay your £4 and Sony spins a big wheel to decide which game you get, "Sorry son, you've got Q'bert reboot. Wanna spin again? That's £4".
If you don't play a lot of games then the chances are you will get a lot less value out of it with free games and discounts. If you don't care if you console as a modern network then you won't see the point for paying for it. Sony is very clear what you get and if you don't see value in it then you don't buy it.
