By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:
So it would be a lot harder to deliver a HW that is illogical and don't get technical advancements? Hope they don't end up with another WiiU revolution. And that is the only reason they are taking long, because since WiiU wasn't successful they can't just upgrade it, they have to change everything, you can see that WiiU succeeded Wii a lot faster because they though they could keep the formula.

?

Wii was succeeded after 6 years on the market, Wii U will be succeeded by NX after less than four and a half.

And we didn't had that much rumours or Nintendo saying they are ready for a successor but not saying much about it. So even if the generation were longer that doesn't mean that the sucessor took longer to be made.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."