setsunatenshi said:
that's fine, all I wanted was to show why that basic definition should not be used to tell someone else they are or aren't a feminist. i personally dislike the term and would never call myself feminist exactly because it would not be a correct term to define my beliefs on the topic of equality. I would call myself an egalitarian and a humanist. I don't need a special term to say I believe women and men should have the same opportunities and not be discriminated. The same way it's enough for me to not be racist, I don't need 1 specific term to say I believe in equality of people of different races. Or that tall and short people should be treated fairly. Equality for blue eyed and brown eyes people is important for me... and so on and so on... i'm not in the position to tell what 'most' feminists believe, or what 'true feminists believe'. for me it's a pointless discussion. if person A tells me they are a feminist i will take them at their word. now if this term is good enough to cover people with such different viewpoints on the same topic, it's pretty much telling me the term is meaningless. I'm sure the so called 'feminazis' as you put it would look at someone like you and say you're not a true feminist. my one and only point: the term feminism is useless and people should be able to state their point of view without using it. it's simply muddying the water. you and me probably would agree on a lot more regarding gender 'politics' than you and the 'extreme' feminists, yet you decide to use the same label they use, I (and many more people that would agree with both of us) don't |
I agree with you that the whole label thing is sort of pointless, what you choose to call yourself doesn't matter, what you stand for is what's important. But of course, this goes both ways.
The real problem, as demonstrated by this thread, is that it's more important to people to discuss what feminist do and don't do, instead of discussing for instance the actual problem presented in the article. Go figure.








