By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
deskpro2k3 said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:

So you're being altruistic? You're interested in the well-being of Nintendo and its customers?

You want Nintendo to support more third-party content, recruit more customers, and make more profits? As someone who prefers PlayStation, I'd assume you'd want Nintendo to draw in fewer customers and fewer exclusives, so as not to rival Sony. Do you see why I'm confused?

I look forward to your response.

You still didn't answer my question.

I was looking forward for your answer, but since it's taking so long, I'll assume you're happy with lesser specs.

I'm not altruistic, I'm a divine hybrid master race.

Chazore said:

He's also got a rig as well which makes me question this even further, unless he's going to entirely invest in all the third parties on future Nintendo systems then I don't see the point as to why Nintendo should be pandering more to third parties who happen to release the same games on multiple systems.

 

 

I said I want a powerful Nintendo console, I never said I will invest in third party games on that specific console. I think, well I thought everyone would agree that a more powerful console can support third party games, which would be good for Nintendo fans, and game developers and publishers.

I personally want better looking Nintendo exclusive games, thus why I want it to have better specs. EX: Xenoblade in a beefier console could've looked so much better.

Yes, I'm fine with low-end specs. I do not see a need for Nintendo to invest in high-end hardware. 

So based on your responses, is it fair to say you want Nintendo to produce cutting-edge hardware so that its exclusive games will look better? Does that mean that 1) you enjoy Nintendo exclusives and 2) think they would achieve maximum potential with more horsepower? And does it mean you would buy NX if it had high-end specs?