| Einsam_Delphin said:
What I said about actuality vs. consideration applies no matter where you are. And again, there is a set criteria for spam that the mods use whenever they actually do lock or prevent threads. Official threads existing is a big one. A mod recently said in the Zelda BotW thread that they'd start cracking down on the excessive Zelda threads, but as we can see that never happened. "when they're actually enforced." Obviously not every single person is gonna adhere to the rules 100% of the time, but they'd do so more often if there's actually bite behind the bark. They cracked down on me and look, I don't make any more "spam" threads. The rule being used against me but not others who're are also breaking the same exact rule only shows hypocrisy (maybe not the right word but you get the idea). Two threads falling under the same exact reasoning for locking, yet only one is locked, that ain't right no matter how you try to spin it. Don't believe me telling you what I meant, fine, not my problem!
|
The set criteria as far as things go varies from mod to mod, hell there are plenty of cases of simple copy+paste article jobs that go unnoticed a lot of the time with only one liners from the op added towards the end, copying the entire article is against the rules as far as things go and that is ahrdly cracked down on and yet people don't seem to care either and just roll with it.
Mods didn't need to crack down on me to not make any spam threads, I just know it's a silly idea and it shows.
The hypocrisy is plenty on the site as there have been folk who were perma banned from the site only to have such a final punishment lifted and given another chance despite the fact that a perma ban means you're gone for good, just breaking that golden rule alone shows hypocrisy but I digress.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
