| Chazore said:
If you've been following the start before I even entered it was a reality. What people consider and don't consider spam seems to go hand in hand on this site from the history of watching the dod random user going "this is spam it should be in X thread" and then being ignored from there on out or argued with, the arguing point displays that some already consider differently to the one complaining in the first place. SOme people don't care about the rules though, that is why they are broken at times, this goes for just about everything with a rule. Those that care about said rules are those that usually get caught out or want to catch someone out, those that follow the rules in general won't need to think or put much effort into wanting to break said rules. See the rule being used against you shows that you fit into one of the categories I mentioned above, you are that one guy as well with the quoted example that tells others that X info belongs in Y thread, that same game that isn't going to do this for literally every single thread for years and years, I know because you won't, no one will because it's always going to be subjective, one day you won't consider a thread as spam or it will be to your liking and then someone like me will step in and fill your shoes, the circle will complete itself and all that remains is to recognize the reflection. I don't think I;m reading too much or too hard, saying "oh well I guess" definitely does have a hint of emotion attached to it, especially the way it was written, that didn't require much thought towards it and asking a mate if he could feel and describe what eharing that sounds like didn't take much either, I could actually got he distance if you;d like and ask some more people tomrorow. Would you want me to look that hard into it?. See that last part is giving you away now, you could at least be a bit more brunt and upfront when shrugging what people say off so easily. |
What I said about actuality vs. consideration applies no matter where you are. And again, there is a set criteria for spam that the mods use whenever they actually do lock or prevent threads. Official threads existing is a big one. A mod recently said in the Zelda BotW thread that they'd start cracking down on the excessive Zelda threads, but as we can see that never happened.
"when they're actually enforced." Obviously not every single person is gonna adhere to the rules 100% of the time, but they'd do so more often if there's actually bite behind the bark. They cracked down on me and look, I don't make any more "spam" threads.
The rule being used against me but not others who're are also breaking the same exact rule only shows hypocrisy (maybe not the right word but you get the idea). Two threads falling under the same exact reasoning for locking, yet only one is locked, that ain't right no matter how you try to spin it.
Don't believe me telling you what I meant, fine, not my problem!
