| Chazore said:
It still doesn't change what I was trying to convey. The rule is ignored out of sheer simplicity to copy+paste information rather than having to type it all out. |
I'm not trying to change it, I'm saying it serves no purpose. I know what you're saying, as I've already acknowledged it's obvious and common sense stuff. What I don't get is why you're even saying it if not to challenge what I'm saying considering you replied to me. That's what you need to actually elaborate on.
Besides the point, again. I nor anyone questioned or asked why the rule was ignored. See I don't get this, I'm directly challenging what you said about thread spam being subjective, yet you've completely ignored that in favor of unnecessarily extrapolating on bits of my post, so now I'm confused as to what you're even trying to accomplish here.
