Wyrdness on 16 June 2016
sc94597 said:
They never mention how they approximated the 1 sq-km per square. Seems like an assumption to me. I think it is better to go off what Nintendo has said (twelve times TP) , especially since it has matched all analyses of the map that use different methodology (besides this one.) If they described how they estimated I could comment on whether it was a good estimation or not. Also, it doesn't seem like you could fit 120 of the demo areas into the map, which would be the implication with their area estimates. |
You yourself made assumptions in your calculations, Nintendo also originally said XCX was 5 times larger than the original and it turned out to be far bigger, they tend to give conservative estimates.
