| think-man said: Im guessing Sony will beef it up, MS showed their hand too early. |
They can't. Dev kits are out. Recalling them would lead to yet another PS3 fiasco all over again...
| Teeqoz said: "This Xbox One will allow full native 4K gaming at 60fps" Well that's certainly optimistic. |
4K 30FPS... They already admitted not all games will be able to handle this, but some will, as some can run 1080p on the XONE and the API's to blame for a lot of bottlenecking (which explains how Fallout 4 pulled off parity at the expense of absolu-fucking-nothing despite stunning graphics, with the only bottleneck being an HDD issue rather than a power one)...
ArchangelMadzz said:
If it's Polaris based that's not happening. And if it's Nvidia based, it's going to be supremely expensive. GTX 1080 can just do that on most games. |
Zen based, since it seems to fit perfectly with projections for it and AMD reports...
| pokoko said: That's quite the sensationalist article you quoted. Anyway, it's not like Microsoft can say anything about it, right? Not after Spencer said pretty much the same thing at the start of the generation. When I asked him about the GPU differential and consequence on long-term performance for Xbox One in an emailed follow-up to our interview, he wrote: "The Xbox One architecture is much more complex than any specific feature or component. The proof is ultimately in what gamers see and experience, and with the diversity and quality of games we have at launch—games like Ryse: Son of Rome and Forza Motorsport 5—we are delivering experiences that demonstrate the power capable only on Xbox One." http://kotaku.com/whats-next-for-the-xbox-one-1471212785?utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow |
Both companies love to spew bull to look good. No surprises there...
