SWORDF1SH on 14 June 2016
| BraLoD said: |
Just to get your thoughts, you're a clever lad.
Do you agree with these statements. And are they objective statements.
Bloodborne is a new IP
The new GoW is part of the GoW IP
AC:BF is part of the AC IP
This statement contradicts itself ' That's why it had to be a different IP and name, but that doesn't make it an entirely new franchise or game.'
Gameplay had nothing to do with what games are covered by that IP
Do you agree with these subjective statements?
Rocket League is a spiritual successor to SRPBC.
Bloodborne isn't a spin-off but could be seen as a spiritual successor to Dark Souls
There's were my points in the posts, more so the objective statements.
