Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
Rest of your post was even more beneath comment. Eh? Both ways? Never use Sony's coup de grace with PS2 to bash PS3, I think you know I won't fall for the bait. Bs. It'll never catch Wii, it'll beat 360 handily, and it won't match PS2. That's the truth. Wait, did you just imply that if PS3 doesn't catch PS2 it SHOWS that the Playstation name is irrelevant? O.M.F.G. Of all the possible tests that are obviously fanboy-created, that one takes the cake, man. Congrats. You lose. You simply type non sequiturs about Microsoft topics and expect people to swallow them.
|
@ the bolded.
Not at all. You are fully aware I implied nothing of the sort. What I did was indicate that you couldn't have a particular argument (one which I've seen you argue both sides for) both ways. Your fully aware of that as well, but being unable to defend your position, you simply decided to avoid the crux of my previous post and try to change the topic by resorting to the usual "he disagrees with me, hes a fanboy" logic you deploy whenever your caught in a tough spot.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
