starcraft said:
As for the last line? You cant have it both ways. Either the PS3 will do fantastically because of the strong Playstation brandname but should be held to account for the beating its taking relative to the PS2 and it should simultaneously be acknowledged that most of the PS3's sales are attributed to brandname rather than console or library quality OR you can say the PS3 is selling well off its own strength but will never catch the Wii, thrash the 360 or match the PS2 due to the Playstations brandname being irrelevant. |
Rest of your post was even more beneath comment.
Eh? Both ways? Never use Sony's coup de grace with PS2 to bash PS3, I think you know I won't fall for the bait. Bs.
It'll never catch Wii, it'll beat 360 handily, and it won't match PS2. That's the truth. Wait, did you just imply that if PS3 doesn't catch PS2 it SHOWS that the Playstation name is irrelevant? O.M.F.G. Of all the possible tests that are obviously fanboy-created, that one takes the cake, man. Congrats.
You lose. You simply type non sequiturs about Microsoft topics and expect people to swallow them.







