I feel like an adjusted score should have a caveat in your list at the very list. If I were to come back in two reviews and say "how did Overwatch get a 95, it had no story!" your response would probably have to be "I didn't count it," and then I'd have to question how it got a 95 when 30 of your points are then impossible to achieve.
The current metric with story rated so importantly isn't at this point conducive to a MP only game, at least to me. That's my only issue with the review though; if there was a footnote about that sort of score then it'd be fine.
Well actually, now that I think about it, how did Mario Maker get an 88 when that game has no story either? Unless story is a bit of a misnomer as you use it, that game could only feasibly obtain an 85 maximum by your current metric.
You should check out my YouTube channel, The Golden Bolt! I review all types of video games, both classic and modern, and I also give short flyover reviews of the free games each month on PlayStation Plus to tell you if they're worth downloading. After all, the games may be free, but your time is valuable!
