Scisca said:
Why? From what point of view? From the point of view of Europe (by Europe I mean - all countries apart from Russia and Germany), he'd be by far the best president. |
From any point of view other than an oligarchical billionaire of light skinned male land owners.
For a Human Rights Point of View:
http://bust.com/general/13923-5-reasons-why-ted-cruz-becoming-president-would-be-bad-for-women.html
From an Environmental Point of View:
From a Political Point of View:
http://personalliberty.com/why-ted-cruz-shouldnt-be-president/
From a Freedom from Religious Point of View:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morgan-guyton/the-theology-of-governmen_b_4020537.html
For Business and the Internet:
http://www.inc.com/jeremy-quittner/ted-cruz-announces-for-presidential-run-2016.html
So to recap: he is bad for human rights, politics, patriotism, the environment, business, freedom of information and the internet and one of the founding principals of the USA which is Freedom from Religion.
I would seriously check your new sources if they are telling you that Ted Cruz is a reasonable person. Even Texans want to get rid of him.







