Azuren said:
Teeqoz said:
See, the thing is, Vivster's first statement didn't say squat about ultrviolent crimes (whatever that is). This is what Vister's first statement was. "If a person wants to willingly physically harm another person it always deserves death."
If he had said that he only meant seriously violent crimes, then we wouldn't have had this dicussion. Of course, he later clarified that he DID in fact only mean seriously violent crimes, akin to those that are currently punished with life in prison. So the discussion was over, even if I disagree with him. But then you came here and started talking shit about me. I then asked you to back up your statements and you unsurprisingly could not.
EDIT: But heck, I'll try to do it for you. The only post where I can understand that you might think as you do about it is this one: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7924686
And at this point, we were still discussing his original statement, which was much more extreme than if we were only talking about seriously violent crimes, and I asked it as a question to actually see what he considered to be too extreme punishment.
Either way, one out of like 10 posts in this thread =/= "all you've been doing in this thread".
|
Again, you're not worth it, so I'm not really interacting with you at this point. I realize my previous post was vague on that, so I'll say it up front for you to clear any confusion: I'm not reading what you have to say to me, nor will I respond beyond this point. I find your opinions awful and your reasoning half-baked, neither of which mesh well with your stubbornness. There is no common ground to meet you on, so good bye.
|
Of course you won't find any common ground to meet me on when you allegedly aren't reading what I'm posting to try and find this middle ground with you. Next time you're thinking about talking substanceless shit about people and then not back it up when you are questioned, here's a piece of advice: just don't talk shit to begin with.
