Azuren said:
Why bother? I'm sure you'll just try to find a way to say it's not what was intended, or I misunderstood, so on and so forth. Even now, you're likely reading this with a relieved-but-smug look on your face, when the fact of the matter is you don't matter enough to warrant me running around this thread to copy paste the several instances where you treat misdemeanors in the same light Vivster was saying he would like to see ultrviolent crimes punished.
tl;dr, You're not worth it, I was lending some advice for you to stop before you escalate things to a ban. |
See, the thing is, Vivster's first statement didn't say squat about ultrviolent crimes (whatever that is). This is what Vister's first statement was. "If a person wants to willingly physically harm another person it always deserves death."
If he had said that he only meant seriously violent crimes, then we wouldn't have had this dicussion. Of course, he later clarified that he DID in fact only mean seriously violent crimes, akin to those that are currently punished with life in prison. So the discussion was over, even if I disagree with him. But then you came here and started talking shit about me. I then asked you to back up your statements and you unsurprisingly could not.
EDIT: But heck, I'll try to do it for you. The only post where I can understand that you might think as you do about it is this one: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7924686
And at this point, we were still discussing his original statement, which was much more extreme than if we were only talking about seriously violent crimes, and I asked it as a question to actually see what he considered to be too extreme punishment.
Either way, one out of like 10 posts in this thread =/= "all you've been doing in this thread".
