Soundwave on 02 June 2016
| fatslob-:O said: It's not rigged but it's severely flawed ... The idea of superdelegates is undemocratic when the party leaders can practically overturn the choice of the public ... The thought of one candidate using it's connections to largely influence the race early on is rather unpalatable when it means fumbling other candidates in the end. I'd rather have first past the post than to have a nomination process consisting of a partial oligarchy ... |
Yeah but the irony here is it's the Sanders camp now calling on superdelegates to over turn the will of the majority of voters (in which Clinton is leading).
Hilary has more votes plain and simple, has nothing to do with delegates, superdelegates or anything, Bernie has less votes which means he's run a spirited campaign, but ultimately a losing campaign.
When Clinton lost to Obama she did eventually cede and fall in line, Bernie should do the same if he loses.
