| d21lewis said: I'll accept your explanation, Normanchacho. But hot about THIS: In Avengers, the government was okay with launching a nuclear missile into the heart of NEW YORK CITY. Luckily, Iron Man was able to fly out through a wormhole and blow up some shit. Nobody considers that the Avengers saved like a million lives? Why blame that on them and not, oh I don't know, Loki! |
The people who wanted to nuke New York City were the overseers of SHIELD. Not technically government in the way you're thinking.
As for Loki, why was Loki on Earth? Because Thor showed up. One of the Avengers brought him after them. Then Sokovia was pretty much all Avengers fault.
People look for people to blame. Not always the right people, but that's the way it works in the real world.
| Uabit said: It just doesn't make sense. Because of the Avengers a lot of people dies in other MCU movies but suddenly people starts to care when they are like 8 movies into the MCU? That's just to mention one from the many flaws this movie has. |
What? They talk about it... like a lot. In Avengers, they mention how Thor and Loki's fight led to them developing tesseract weaponry in case something like that happens again. In the end, when they're showing news clips about the incident, several people talk about the Avengers as a threat. At the end when Fury is talking to the TV head dudes that run SHIELD he specifically says "they're dangerous". A huge plot point in Iron Man 2 is about Iron Man's armor getting into the wrong hands and the potential danger.
It's brought up in a lot of the movies. Since the movies are focussed on the action at hand, it's in the background. It just comes to the forefront in this one.
