Why is there a bias against MP only games?

[AnthonyW86]

Jpcc86 said:

I feel "there's not enough content to justify a $60 tag" is argument enough.

If you like MP-only games that's fine, to each his own. Some of us consider multiplayer, specially in FPS games, something that should be a plus/bonus to a game, no the game itself. Again, to each his own.

I agree, also multiplayer games these days are very reliant on payed DLC. In other words not only might $60 be too much for a multiplayer only game, it becomes even more expensive if we include DLC.

So personally in some cases i might actually be willing to pay $60 for a multiplayer game in total, but not only for what you get day one. For example $40 for the game and two DLC packs at $10.