| *bleu-ocelot* said: Hey can't we all agree that reviewer's just plain suck at their jobs nowadays? |
Even if Haze is the worst game on the planet, which it probably isn't, I like how it has helped gamers on all sides of the console war agree on something. =P
Anyway, I was mildly amused when I heard of the 4.5 score, but now that I think about it, the score is probably too low. Haze may not be original, or even good, but scores this low should only be given to games that are virtually unplayable. The tone in the IGN review sounds like they'd give it a 6 or 7 or something, and nothing they say makes it sound completely horrible. Also, every single aspect of the game being bad enough to be rated 4-5? That's a damn near perfect example of halo effect we got her.
I can fairly be described as anti-PS3, but honestly think IGN should rethink the score. Maybe have someone else give it a second opinion, since the guy who did the current review obviously enjoyed it less than the average guy. I have absolutely no interest in ever playing Haze myself, but a dodgy review is a dodgy review, and we shouldn't pretend it isn't just because it's for an exclusive on a console we don't like.
