So, Civil War is a beautiful mess (spoilers)

[DonFerrari]

Runa216 said:

Lawlight said:

BvS was a breeze to follow compared to this. But the difference in this is that a lot of scenes being jumped to don't matter since there is no context to them. Like of Zemo's planning and doing stuff. But even besides that, holy cow was there a lot of jumping around. Cap was in the US in the Avenger's complex, gets a text message, next he's in London, sees some TV footage, next he's in Vienna and then jumps to Bucharest where he somehow finds Bucky. All the while, Zemo is out and about - Cleveland, Vienna, who knows where else. Tony Stark does some jumping around as well - Massachussets to have a lame excuse of a guilt trip, Vienna, Queens.

How did Zemo convince everyone that it was Winter Soldier who bombed the UN?

You've got some real problems or terrible bias if you think that the pacing and editing of Civil War was bad but Batman v Superman was easy to follow.  As a student of film and television, I can assure you that Civil War was leagues above, ahead, and beyond the terrible editing and pacing of Batman v Superman. In fact, one of the biggest gripes about Batman v Superman was its terrible pacing, editing, and lack of establishing shots, whereas one of the better elements of Civil War was its editing. 

Seriously, this is just more proof that your opinion in this matter is worthless as little more than flame bait or biased nonsense.  At this point it's clear you're just trolling or have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Either way, your words are useless to all except to those who already agree with you and are just desperate to have someone on their side. 

I see... so you as a student knows a lot better than the renowed director, ok.