By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dulfite on 20 May 2016
Edit Thread
hoala said:
Dulfite said:

2) Graphical comparisons showed that some of them were about the same, if not slightly better, but hardly noticable and on others they looked worse.

Its a pretty big difference. Look at 2:36 if you dont see it.

 

And do you really think that the wii u would had done much better in 2012-2013 if games like bioshock infinte, Crysis 3 and dark souls 2 would be released as well? I highly doubt it. The real big seller (assassins creed, fifa, cod) all were on the wii u.

I find the difference barely anything. And I'm a Nintendo fanman that owns a Wii U.

Also, BO2 was released like a week or two after for the Wii U compared to the other two. Everyone knows CoD fans are the type that freak out and buy it day one and have no patience (which is why CoD sales usually plunge after launch week unlike Nintendo games which have good legs) so if it isn't out on the console day 1 then no one is going to wait around for that version.

And I absolutely think the Wii U would have done better had it had not only more 3rd party support, but good ports with an actual use for the gamepad.

AC3 sucked on the Wii U. There are glitches everywhere and the community knew it. I reviewed that game and destroyed it for it's glitches. As for Fifa, I don't think Nintendo ever did well with Fifa. And BO2 also had some serious glitches/lag/crashes.