| midrange said: With regards to the price, you do have a point. A short game can justify a $60 purchase. However, star fox zero does not immediately fall into that category by default. Many people in this thread are under the assumption that it does and they just throw around "replayability" as an excuse when they really shouldn't |
Fair enough. I really like Star Fox Zero, but I understand and respect those who don't. And replayability isn't necessarily a great thing. If the gameplay stinks, who cares how long or how re-playable it is?
I guess I just don't like the philosophy that argues longer = better (that's what SHE said). I did a little aritmetic with my top 20 games, and there is a lot of diversity when it comes to play time.
1) 40 hours
2) 30 hours
3) 10 hours
4) 20 hours
5) 40 hours
6) 15 hours
7) 20 hours
8) 70 hours
9) 18 hours
10) 8 hours
11) 18 hours
12) 25 hours
13) 5 hours
14) 15 hours
15) 25 hours
16) 8 hours
17) 10 hours
18) 20 hours
19) 20 hours
20) 5 hours
