Final-Fan said:
I'm not even sure where to begin. Brazil doing it doesn't mean it's OK for the USA to do it. [edit: Nor Brazil, for that matter.] And these weren't people that the government had any evidence against. Lots of them weren't even people who had come from Japan. Their parents had, or their grandparents. They were United States citizens, born and raised in the USA and shipped from the only home they had known to a military prison camp with inadequate food, shelter, education (many of them children), medicine, etc. Many of them lost their property while they were held, not to mention lost income. I'm not aware that they were compensated at all upon their release, although decades later (1980s or 90s?) there was some compensation and a public apology from the US government. In what way do you argue that holding less than 1,000 people accused of terrorism in Guantanamo is not as bad as holding over 100,000 people accused of nothing in these interment camps? |
It seems you ignore the potential for spies and that if you read japanese fiction/stories you would see that is a common trait they had for make root spies that could stay dorment for generations.
So yes, it was justifiable to hold people that could possibly endanger the rest of the population in a camp during the time they could have acted. The newer germans should as well be held? Probably, but there were also those that had no ties with German anymore. As far as I know Japanese at the time were very guetto people.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







