| Okie_Loki said: Sorry to detract, but I just want to bring up an example of bias, since apparently it doesn't exist in favor of Disney/Marvel. IGN currently has twelve (12), that's TWELVE stories on their front page in direct relation to Civil War. Batman v Superman had about 4 or 5 over 2-3 days and all but one of those was negative as I recall. Just something to laugh at, everyone's free to go look right now if they wish. I just counted and unless they cycle through their stories, that's where it currently stands. |
And this is bias because? Are they obligated to give equal coverage?
There is always the possibility of ad money being paid out but there are also other explanations. If IGN is putting up that many articles, couldn't it be because the Marvel movies generate more clicks? Or that they just like the movie more and had more to say about it?
As for the negativity of the article... That's not an ign thing. Whether you agree or not, most critics and people on the internet liked Civil War better.
It could be a conspiracy, or it could be that one was great and the other was not. I mean... Arkham City got WAY more coverage than Spider-man Edge of Time did. Is that a conspiracy, or was one just better?







