By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
-Ack!- on 05 May 2016
Edit Thread
TheBlackNaruto said:
Ruler said:

Well why has rise of the tomb raider gotten a 86 then? it wasnt liniar, and no liniar game with zero back tracking deserves such a high score like 94 to be honest. Its unfair to all the other games who give a huge effort designing their maps etc.

WHy does it not deserve it and how is it now fair to other games? Maybe ROTR got an 86 because it was a good game just not as good as UC4...is there something wrong with that? Neither is a bad game so what is the issue? Maybe UC4 executed things better than ROTR and was for fulfilling...I don't get what the issue you have with the score is.....also side note..... Are you the same person who made the FFXV grpahics thread?

@Ruler

Seriously? What's wrong with linear games, and why on default non-linear games would be better? Also larger areas don't necessarily take more effort they just take different kind of effort. And also the scores are not based on effort, but the end result of that effort.

Sure we have opinions but saying that [non-linear > linear]  is always the case is BS. By those standards we should base review scores on map size.

IMO non-linearity ruined Metal Gear series, (but It's great in Warrior Within) yet I understand why many people liked MGSV. Whether linearity is a good thing is based entirely on the game at hand, the same shoes just won't fit every feet...