By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wonktonodi said:
Aeolus451 said:

Could you please read the title and the op. Does it say anything about any bets or predictions before the feast of crows thread? Isn't this particular thread about checking the avatars for the 2016 people? Take it to a wall, if you don't want to let it go.

it doesn't even say the civil way thread in the op or even 2016. It has a list of names there including people who didn't agree to the bet.

However what I was saying to bigtalika does aplly to you as well in some ways. I'm in here because several users bring up there "winnning" elsewhere, as well as hounding other users elsewhere. So here seems a very apropriate place to tell you guys to be more humble, to remember that many of the users who took it as a bet, did make it clear in there post in the thread or only put a year, I was also pointing out how hounding a prediction in that threat that said March 2017 as the latest makes no sence when bigtalikka had even said Nov. 2017 which is more wrong. For something to be in good fun, you're ruining the experience on here for some of us who had nothing to do with it.

Had you guys done that, I wouldn't be here. So no, this shouln't just go on one persons wall, you as a community should be doing much better than you are.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7884134

Well that didn't take long, lol.

The issue is (even as you have said yourself), even with the Nov 2017 "prediction" (which I even said I definitely am not saying it WILL happen at the end) it doesn't negate my 2017 predictions which make me right, even when looking at March 2017. 

Next, the thread that even predicted March 2017, the user didn't stick with that date. If so, the user would have been right. However, he predicted a release of 2016, so he got it "more wrong"  wrong compared to my 2017.

So basically, you are going against your own rules of not being able to pick specific predictions (and even using a prediction I said "I definitely am not saying it will happen") to try and paint a picture of "more right" and "more wrong", further ruining the experience for others here by dragging this out further. You're part of the problem now.

But I will be willing to discuss this further on my wall if you'd like. I'm calling a cease fire on this thread.

*Note*  " for "more right" and "more wrong" are used being that there is no such thing as being "more right" or "more wrong". You are either right or wrong. You can be closer to the right answer, but that does not make you "more right".