kenzomatic on 19 May 2008
| Final-Fan said: By request, but so "quick and dirty" it's probably worthless: NES 62m Others 13+7 (est. miscellany) 76% if 20m others Note: This era is pretty fuzzy for counting generations; the 2600 was a highly successful zombie while the Genesis and TG16 both straddled the NES' and SNES' lifetimes. I put the TG16 and Genesis both into competition only with the SNES for this, and did not consider 2600 sales. SNES 49m Others 31+2+10+5 (est. miscellany) 51% N64 33 PS 102 Others 9+5 (est. miscellany) 22% 68% GC 22 PS2 135 (est.) Others 25+9 12% 71% GUESSES Wii 150 PS3 50-70 360 40-50 63-56% 21-26% |
Well with your numbers and averaging the selected generations market shares we get this:
NES(gen3) & SNES(gen4) = 63.5%
PS1(gen5) & PS2(gen6) = 69.5%
Average with PS3 (21-26%) and Wii (56-63%)
Nintendo = 61-63%
Sony = 53-55%
 | "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked. | |
ioi + 1
