Miguel_Zorro said:
RolStoppable said:
It's time to let it go, slob.
Miguel_Zorro, who would be willing to enforce the "bet" (he already edited my signature, after all), got called out by a neutral observer in another thread and could not refute either of the two key points:
1. There was no bet to begin with, because there was a failure to establish clear rules as well as commitment to a bet.
2. The longwinded arguments that led to the creation of the Civil War thread were oversimplified by making the whole issue a binary thing. It's just not right that the side who said that the Wii U won't get any more games should be considered wrong while people who believed that there would be more Wii U first party support should be considered right.
That means it's over.
|
I got called out by somebody? If I did, I obviously didn't care enough to bother "refuting" whatever it was they had to say. I have not expressed a serious opinion related to this in any way.
If I wanted to enforce a bet, I would. I have no stake in this. Although I do find the reactions of some people to this interesting.
I don't think anything I did or did not do means it's over. But if you want it to be over, bumping this thread is a great way to do it (sarcasm).
It's amazing that such a simple thing has been screwed up so badly. Way to go people. Way. To. Go. Nintendomination indeed!
|
Just wait until the PS5, XBONE-2 "what's next gen" arguements.
