WTF? Now, Ocarina of Time slaps back!

[catprog]

CAL4M1TY said:

ssj12 said:

LordTheNightKnight said:
The reviews counted was dropped from 32 to 31.

There was also an increase in the number of garbage websites accepted as eligable sitesto effect reviews. Really who ever heard of FragLand, AtomicGamer, Lawrence. It's compete bs accepting these sites as sites like IGN.

I completely agree with you ssj12. While metacritic is alot worse at including no name/garbage websites, both are equally guilty of it and personally I believe they should have site users to vote on a top 20 reviews sites and only their reviews can effect the score. That'd fix the issue of current games with 50+ reviews competing with 10 year old games with ~30 reviews and the issue of nintendo games always having way more reviews than the other two platforms (which makes it all the more amazing that SMG is 4th, despite the massive 70 review count).

 I think each site is weighted diffrently.

 

see the average of the reviews for Balls of fury is 24 but they are listed as 19