t3mporary_126 said:
I think the active deployment of the bombs in Japan in WW2 was a diaster as a result of war that was worse than Cheronobyl which was unintentional. But maybe that's just subjective. |
Fair enough... The size of the nuclear event in Chernobyl was larger but Hiroshima caused far more loss of life, and I agree it was worse (just like an 8.2 earthquake in a major city would be worse than a 8.6 in the middle of nowhere). I would sooner call it a massacre rather than a disaster, which carries a connotation of being an accident ("ill-fated"). But it's not unreasonable to classify deliberate acts of war as disasters.