midrange said:
Yea I know. But the reviews aren't giving the game an unreasonably low score. They've all provides fair claims (graphics, controls, length, so on), but a lot of posts (especially on this thread) just dismiss them with cop outs. "Gaming journalism is dead", "gaming journalism only likes open world," "journalists need to git gud."
Some people bash starfox for the craziest reasons, but these reviews all give valid claims. So why are the reviewers getting hated on? |
It just seems kinda weird seeing 6 or 7s as low scores. They're not great per se, but more on the decent side. I mean I've seen more 7s and 6s and a few 8s and a couple 9s from my observation so there are positive responses. This game is considered mostly mixed with a little more positive than negative (to me, negative is below 5).
