By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mar1217 said:
midrange said:

Yea I know. But the reviews aren't giving the game an unreasonably low score. They've all provides fair claims (graphics, controls, length, so on), but a lot of posts (especially on this thread) just dismiss them with cop outs. "Gaming journalism is dead", "gaming journalism only likes open world," "journalists need to git gud."

 

Some people bash starfox for the craziest reasons, but these reviews all give valid claims. So why are the reviewers getting hated on?

Because I guess :

1) There's people being pissed off.

2) Some reviewers weren't willing to go out of their comfort zone and just dissmissed the controls right away. Thus the '' Git gud ''

3) Cause opinions.

1) Being pissed off really isn't a good reason to spread unwanted hate at people or give unfair opinions

2) yes that polygon reviewer was infuriating (basically being unfair to the game which is a no no). But he's the only unfair reviewer I saw and his report didn't affect meta critic if I remember