Mar1217 said:
midrange said:
People can like the game. There's no big deal with that. But look at the other comments of this thread. There are a lot of people bashing reviewers with bogus reasons like "they gave it a mediocre score because it's not open world." The game is heavily flawed (I blame mismanagement by Nintendo) but rather than address the flaws of the game, they unnecessarily defend the game with b.s. reasons or cop outs.
This is supposed to be nintendos second biggest game of the year. It's clear that starfox zero will underperform in all categories. That's why it annoys me that people dismiss constructive criticism with "this is the fall of gaming journalism"
|
And it goes the other way around too you know. Our world isn't just Black or White, it's grey.
|
Yea I know. But the reviews aren't giving the game an unreasonably low score. They've all provides fair claims (graphics, controls, length, so on), but a lot of posts (especially on this thread) just dismiss them with cop outs. "Gaming journalism is dead", "gaming journalism only likes open world," "journalists need to git gud."
Some people bash starfox for the craziest reasons, but these reviews all give valid claims. So why are the reviewers getting hated on?
