sc94597 said:
Your point was that the military was supposedly some good and it was socialist. I argued that it was bad, and it was precisely because of its socialist nature. Without public funding there would be no military, so I don't know what you mean by "doesn't matter what form the government is" because every standing army is funded through socialist means - taxation. Voluntary militias don't have the same problems with ignoring morality as standing armies do. Social Security - Below is when the boomers just started retiring in 2010. |
So by your own admission the current retirees are still getting more than they put in to Social Security - non adjusted for inflation. Still if they keep living, they use up much more.
And even your volunteer firefighters get pain - by your data. Don't they deserve to making a living? It’s hard to pay rent with ‘thank yous.’
And the military, by it's nature, I didn't argue if it was good or bad, but that people in it, retired from it, and married to members were all being supported financially by socialism.
Do you have a point or you just want to hate the future?