Peh said:
Love being called as someone who commits ad hominem, but it seems it's ok to use ad hominem against me. *thumbs up* Oh, I did adress what you've posted. The conclusion was, it's not a reprensentable statistic for the rest of europe. You've pointed out a high rape crime done by immigrants in sweden, but looking at the statitistics I've provided, and no one else looked at it until now, it is not the case for all the other states. And just to take on the argument of having a low amount of immigrants compared to natives but higher crime rate. I.e.: I have a state of 1 million people where only 100 of them are immigrants. These 100 are all criminals. This means all immigrants have a crime rate of 100%. Can I use this statistic as an argument for calling the majority of immigrants criminal aswell, even if the amount of immigrants in other states are higher, but have a lower crime rate? Well, that example is actually YOUR argument which you are holding right now with your post. I don't think it holds any value. But keep on defending it if you want.
Also.. what does it matter where I am coming from? Looking for an opening? |
"I have a state of 1 million people where only 100 of them are immigrants. These 100 are all criminals. This means all immigrants have a crime rate of 100%. Can I use this statistic as an argument for calling the majority of immigrants criminal aswell, even if the amount of immigrants in other states are higher, but have a lower crime rate?"
Of course you can use that number. It makes a part of the overall picture, a part of the crime situation of the countries in question.