Wii's sucess - sweet revenge

[Rock_on_2008]

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Rock_on_2008 said:

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Kasz216 said:
Ehh... if posts like this keep happening it's going to be harder and harder to come here.

"Revenge" really?

Revenge for what? Making a better product that last two generations?

I mean, if you didn't buy a playstation system the last two generations and instead got nintendo systems i'm guessing you did for the first party. So who cares?

What do you need revenge for? I mean the Gamecube and N64 had a handful of the best games of each generation. Nothing to be getting "revenge" over.

I think the N64 gives the PS1 a run for its money.

Also, why do you have to flame Nintendo everytime a fanboy makes a post like this? All of you are guilty, flamers.

 

If you wanna judge a system by sales, like you are the cube and the n64, then apparently you think the Wii is twice as good as the PS3 and 360 combined.

N64 failed by being the last cartridge based console. If it was a CD based console N64 would of done so much better. Cartidges are expensive and have limited storage capacity. CD's storage capcity exceeds cartridge storage capacity and are much cheaper to produce than cartridges

However, it had Goldeneye, Starfox 64, Mario 64, Ocarina of Time, and Mario 64. Those games by themselves stand up against everything on the PS1 except the FF series which admittedly tips the PS1 as the winner for me, however, like I said, it is still debatable. If a person hates RPG's, then the N64 probably wins by miles.

 

The other notable series, imo on the PS1 is the RE series, 1-3, which are all amazing, to this day, even though a lot of people hate on old RE, I was always and still am a huge fan.

 Those games you mentioned were good games but the N64 would of been better if it was in a CD format instead of cartridges. PSX games were cheaper than N64 games for both consumers and manufacturers. N64 abandoning third party support and being totally reliant on first party Nintendo titles was also a huge error.