Lawlight said:
Thank you for proving my point - several cases of reviewers' RT being higher than the audience who should be much more forgiving. And the very fact that 75% of reviewers recommended Iron Man 3 says it. Critics should be much more critical and less forgiving than the general audience. But that's not the case here. |
Not sure if trolling or doesn't understand how math and statistics work...
Average user score=79% Average critic score= 82%. So no, critics are not preferring marvel's movies better than audiences.
Also... not sure if trolling or doesn't understand what the word consistently means...
"Disney bought their good graces, yes. You know something is wrong when movies from a studio is consistently liked more by critics than the general audience. The latter is supposed to be more forgiving and critics more critical."
Of the 9 movies I gave, 3 of them had a higher review score on RT from critics then audiences. 1/3 of the time is not consistently by any stretch of the imagination. Consistently technically means always. Colloquially, it can mean most of the time. One out of three times is not consistent. Several times =/= consistently. If you think my post in any way proved your point you're mathing wrong.
If we go to the metacritic examples that conveniently were ignored, audience scores were higher by an average of 12% points. The critic score was never higher. If you look up all the marvel movies (which I'm not going to post here, check it out if you actually care), there is not one instance of audience scores being higher than critic scores. Now THAT is consistent.
