JWeinCom said:
Actually there is a pretty big disconnect... Avengers had a rotten tomatoes score of 92%. The user score was 91%. Clearly one percent of the critics were bribed. Winter Soldier had an 89% rotten tomatoes score. User score is 92%. The critics must have been paid to lower the score to avoid suspicion... Age of Ultron had a 75% score on rotten tomatoes, and an 84% user score. Iron man 3 is 75% to 75%. Thor is another epic display of clear bribery. 77% score from critics but a mere 76% from users. Guardians of the Galaxy:91%(critics) to 92%.(audience) Thor Dark World 67% The First Avenger was 79% Incredible Hulk 67%
When we look at Metacritic, it's even worse. Winter Soldier 70% Critics Avengers 69% Ant Man 64% Guardians of the Galaxy (76%) c 86% (a)
Clearly Disney is engaged in a massive conspiracy to inflate their ratings.
Some people will insist that the world is wrong to make themselves right. |
to 79%. (a)Thank you for proving my point - several cases of reviewers' RT being higher than the audience who should be much more forgiving.
And the very fact that 75% of reviewers recommended Iron Man 3 says it. Critics should be much more critical and less forgiving than the general audience. But that's not the case here.
