Teeqoz said:
outlawauron said:
What you're also missing is that no one believes that Tri-Ace did this decision on their own. Square making a decision would mean that something forced on them from someone not actually making the game.
|
S.T.A.G.E. said:
A decision made for financial gain is still a choice to censor the product because of money. Your motivations are because of profit reasons and not just your own gut feelings .Businesses more often than not will go for the best financial option than what they innately like. The best financial option is to be censored by the west. They could also do what theyve done for years and make a japanese and western version of their games. The problem with that though is today games are more expensive to make.
|
Guys, both of you. I'm not saying that it isn't censored. I've never said that. SE censored it. I am merely saying that no one forced SE to make the decision to do this, and they could have let it be the way it was, so the blame (if you feel inclined to blame anyone for something this trivial) is on SE.
|
I kind of agree. Square is at fault for allowing potential backlash to step into the game to change something so arbitrary. The actions of some have created an environment where this type of questions even happens is what creates this type of thing in the first place.
