By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
daredevil.shark on 14 April 2016
Edit Thread
ThisanmU said:
daredevil.shark said:
Despite a game looking visually ugly some people have taken a mission to prove this game looks good. And when visual comparisons are made they run and hide under the shield of gameplay. Lol. How lower the standards have fallen overall gamers and the thread quality of this site. When we can see the truth people will just shut their eyes. Well then. Back to other site. Since common logic won't work here (at least at current situation).

Please, watch this video gameplay, BUT, watch it calmly, paying close attention to textures, lighting, ambiance... think about it running at 50~60 fps on gamepad and TV, maybe you can fell it if you watch in 720phd resolution >

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rziicW7tzvQ

Now, tell me, with all this action going on in real time, exploring almost all graphical console capabilities, specific shaders... Do you really think it's ugly? I'm sorry, I think we have a problem of concepts or definitions of what is beautiful , I mean, of course there are lots of games with different artistic directions that may looks better for you, but it doesn't mean this game is ugly. To my eyes it looks amazing, better than Hyrule Warriors or Twilight Princess HD. About the comparison, c'mon, in my opinion people are joking or being stingy, lol... It can't be serious compare those games to SF0. Wrongs!

First of all, if you are an alt (which is likely), get a life. There are lots of nice things to do in life instead of being an alt in a forum. Lol.

Second of all, the game looks like shit. A PS2 era game in 720p resolution. Compared to ratchet and clank visuals looks like boring, uninspired and cheap game. An yeah. My eyes are also ok. If a game looks bad I don't pretend that it's good only because it's in my preferred system. OP also knows it and indirectly acknowledged in his post.

- Moderated, Carl