By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mar1217 said:
JRPGfan said:

That is exactly what most people want.

Alot of people are dissapointed by the graphics.

They would rather have a rock solid 30 fps, single screen starfox game, that in turn looked much much prettier.

Smooth 30 FPS >> 60 FPS

Lol.

I prefer higher frame rate, sorry mate

Starfox on the SNES ran at like 19 fps.

No one complained back then about fps.

Also theres no reason you cant have a 60 fps game that looks better than what Starfox Zero does.

Dr.Vita said:

Let's be honest Star Fox Zero looks terrible for a 2016 game...
It could be a 2005-2006 game imo but nowhere near to be called a true 8th gen game.
Just compare it with Ratchet & Clank on PS4, Sony and Insomniac Games put so much love in that game. But Star Fox Zero looks like it isn't even finished by Nintendo, probably because Nintendo wanted to release the game as soon as possible for the Wii U.

^ that is my issue.

Its not just the graphics alone. Starfox Zero doesnt look like the standard you expect from Nintendo.