By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight on 09 April 2016
Edit Thread
DakonBlackblade said:
Chris Hu said:

I'm thinking that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 must have been way over budget its visual effects where less then impressive for a movie that had a production bugdet of $255 million dollars.  Plus Hans Zimmers score was also wasn't that good not even close to some of his best work all the other Spider Man movies had better scores as a matter of fact the score by Danny Elfman for the first Spider-Man movie (2002) is one of the best super hero movie scores of all time.

Putting things in perspective once again:

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-08/-batman-v-superman-seen-earning-less-profit-than-superman-alone 

“Batman v Superman,” one of the most expensive films ever made, is on pace to produce a $278 million profit for Warner Bros. once home video, TV and merchandise proceeds are tallied, according to SNL Kagan analyst Wade Holden. That’s less than the estimated $300 million the studio earned from “Man Of Steel.”
To be as profitable as the lower-budget “Man of Steel” -- and some of the more successful Marvel films, which generate 44 percent net profit on average -- “Batman v Superman” would have to gross $1.15 billion worldwide, Holden estimates. “Age of Ultron” earned $853 million, he estimates.

Still 2 more movies added to the slate with the same vision being carried over for Justice League. In the meantime, Disney considers AoU a failure despite all the money it made.