LudicrousSpeed said:
LOL. No one is talking about "new criteria for winning E3". This is my look almost a year later back at E3, nothing more. You should probably lighten up and stop trying to analyze this so much, its really quite simple. Also, damn this site blows on mobile. |
Ok, instead of just ignoring the entire point I was making (twice), I'll reduce it to a simple question: will you or will you not admit that what you're saying is that MS won E3 2015 because games from old announcements have released? And if that's not what you're saying (don't want it to be perceived as a loaded question) then clarify.
The "much larger chunk of what they showed" and the games you "give points to for being out and playable now" are what you, yourself, have said is the reason you believe MS had the best conference. But those games were announced years ago and have been shown multiple times. So, yes or no: you think they won because announcements from years ago finally released?
Simple question.
PS: when I said "new criteria for winning", I wasn't saying that that's what you were talking about it, in particular. It was just a conclusion one would come to after based on your comments.
