By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AsGryffynn on 07 April 2016
Edit Thread
fatslob-:O said:
AsGryffynn said:

When they own the cash cow known as x86? Of course it will look like bread crumbs, especially since they don't have a good reputation on the dedicated GPU market, but that doesn't means they cannot because it worked and it was powerful. If they wanted, they could land a contract with MS for the next Xbox and create an enhanced version of Larrabee and nobody would care because console gamers don't look at the manufacturer and PC gamers go with what they know... 

And I contributed. Next time think twice before you post something. If you can't say anything nice, keep it out... 

There's also the Xbox One GPU and the new HD Graphics that is close when it comes to performance, so yeah, since the PS4's GPU is the most powerful AMD has created, nothing tells me Intel can't play that game as well... 

I just know I dislike AMD and I'd rather not deal with them... 

If they wanted is not good enough and what people want are results, not potential ... 

@Bold Hilarious, a pot calling the kettle black ... 

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 matching the Xbox One with a vastly superior transistor technology after two years later is progress alright ... /sarcasm 

I also dislike AMD, at least their CPUs and the direction their going but it's not like we should care about whatever manufacturer Microsoft is using like you said ...

We literally can't know how they will do if we don't ask them and nobody's ever asked! 

Oh, but you started it!  

By the way, the IPG is not an standalone unit and we're dealing with something with a processor that is far more powerful that anything the Xbox One has. I shall remind you we're dealing with the forerunners of the technology you're using. They don't do graphics, but they can... 

And I do care, but not that much. I am just saying I'd welcome less AMD in the console market...