By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:

Graphics still look so damn dated...
I really wish nintendo had done better when it comes to how this game looks.

I know they did a small bit of polishing to get it looking a tiny bit better, but it just not up to par with todays standards.

 

*edit: looked at youtube comments afterwards:

"In so many ways, this looks like a game lost in time; and not in the good way. It's just all so dated looking, from the presentation and graphics to the HUD/GUI elements and beyond. It's like the game hasn't really moved on from the N64 era, as if presentation hasn't evolved in the last 20 years."

"Some weakass textures"

"I wouldn't say Star Fox are back in action. This is around the fifth version of the first game. Not quite the full team either. It's missing the main female character and member of Star Fox team, Krystal."

"Krystal DLC when?"

 We all know the game has not amazing graphics, it has been almosta year with the same shit over and over, and always ignoring the fact that is running at 60fps on 2 screens.

What about the majority of good comments? Why are you even mentioning them to begging with? All games have some bad coments on youtube, the dislike bars is quite short though.

Sure is not on the level of graphics today but how is this a bad looking game? Corneria feels off but the rest looks nice.

   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbm3ylIlFKw