" to judge its performance, and it's even harder with the PS4/X1 having custom chips that aren't..." /> " to judge its performance, and it's even harder with the PS4/X1 having custom chips that aren't..." /> " to judge its performance, and it's even harder with the PS4/X1 having custom chips that aren't..." /> " to judge its performance, and it's even harder with the PS4/X1 having custom chips that aren't..." />
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEMC on 05 April 2016
Edit Thread

It's hard to compare CPUs having only " > " to judge its performance, and it's even harder with the PS4/X1 having custom chips that aren't available anywhere else. As a reference, this is a comparison of the FX-8350 and the Athlon 5150, which is a quad-core based Jaguar CPU clocked at 1.6GHz (like the PS4):
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/697?vs=1224

Of course, the processors of PS4/X1 have eight cores (although they can only use 6 or 7), so their actual performance is higher than that, but by how much? I don't know.

As for what processor can be power the NX... who knows? It could be a similar custom chip but with 8 Puma (the successor of Jaguar) cores clocked slightly higher.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.