By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jason1637 on 02 April 2016
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
jason1637 said:

A 78 is mediocre. Comparing it to 5th and 6th genes don't really make sense because the standards for games and reviewers have became more harsh.

I'm sure QB will be a good game. I'm even planning on still getting the game but 78 is still mediocre. 

And the standard says that a 78 is mediocre? Got it. So, Until Dawn must also be mediocre - even though the industry praised it. Doesn't take a genius to see why that line of thinking doesn't work. 

As for the word mediocre: of only moderate quality; not very good. Thus, you're saying the game is not very good, based on a 78. Regardless of changing standards (which I didn't know this was an applied rule), that makes no sense at all, especially since it is a contradiction, in your case. A game can't be both "good" and "mediocre". It's even funnier when you consider the very source you're using. "Generally favorable reviews". How does that translate into mediocre?

@ BraLoD: I don't ever recall saying you couldn't talk about it.

Until Dawn wasn't a AAA game and so the score it got was acceptable. It's different from QB a game that took over 3 years to make.

Now I said that the reviews are mediocre but ti seems like a game I'll like. So in my personal opinion the game looks like its good but review wise its mediocre.